Cox’s Corner All Time Divisional Boxing Ratings

By: Monte D. Cox



Updated 4/17/2021


Sixty odd years ago in 1958 Nat Fleischer, founder of Ring magazine, published for the first time his all time divisional boxing ratings. In those ratings Nat rated men in only one division. In 2005 I participated in the IBRO (International Boxing Research Organization) all time poll (and again in 2019/20). In that poll we decided to avoid debates over what division a multi-division champion should be rated by having the voters vote for boxers in each division they were eligible. In my personal ratings however, I have rated boxers only in one division preferring to rate them at their best weight. For instance, men like Gene Tunney and Ezzard Charles are considered at light-heavyweight and not at heavyweight, while Bob Fitzsimmons is rated at middleweight and Ray Robinson at welterweight and so on. Since Fleischer first offered his ratings there have been over 60 more years of boxing history. In 1958 by my ratings Jack Dempsey would be the # 2 all time heavyweight. But since then there have been some men who deserve to be rated above him.

It is most important when rating fighters to be objective. Some will not give credit to modern fighters. Others do not give credit to the greats of the past. So many commentators and fans do not seem to be able to keep from crossing that threshold of objectivity, either over estimating the abilities of the legends and ascribing them abilities that are not present on film or not having the knowledge to understand what some of the greats brought to the ring. Both views are completely wrong. My researched ratings are both fair and balanced. Here is Cox’s Corner’s all time boxing ratings.






Heavyweight Ratings

  1. Joe Louis
  2. Muhammad Ali
  3. George Foreman
  4. Sonny Liston
  5. Lennox Lewis
  6. Evander Holyfield
  7. Mike Tyson
  8. Larry Holmes
  9. Jack Dempsey
  10. Rocky Marciano





As one can see my list has changed slightly since my 2005 and 2020 IBRO ratings. Some historians lists have not changed in 30 years, but a keen open minded observer will constantly reassess his position. Numbers one and two have not changed. The truth is if Joe Louis and Muhammad Ali are not rated in the top two at heavyweight then the list is just wrong. There is no argument. Joe Louis had the most successful defenses and longest reign, and more importantly he was fundamentally flawless, the most complete fighter in division history. See my video The Subtle Skills of Joe Louis. Muhammad Ali faced and defeated the best competition in division history and dominated boxing for most of the 60's and 70's. If Ali and Louis are not in the top two then the list is not credible, I don't care whose list it is.

Just Missed: Joe Frazier, Jack Johnson, Jim Jeffries,

Frazier or Marciano?

Marciano and Frazier are about equals. Both were swarming style heavyweights who came in low and attacked the body then ripped to the head. Both were tough fighters. With only one being able to fit in the top 10 what separates them? Is it Rocky's undefeated record or Frazier's better opposition with losses to only men in the top 3? Joe's competition trumps Marciano's but in the end I prefer Rocky in a head to head confrontation, although that is not a given


George Foreman is Cox's Corner's # 3 all time heavyweight. Read George Foreman: King of the Super Heavyweights to find out why.


Why Jim Jeffries has dropped in my rankings:

While I do not question Big Jeff's athleticism, strength, or endurance there are 3 reasons for dropping him from my list:

  1. He only won 18 pro fights.
  2. There is a lack of good quality film in which to make a realistic assessment of his ability.
  3. His punching power is over rated based on his record. The claim that he hit as hard as Foreman or Liston seems nonsensical based on an overall lack of early round knockouts. Jeff wore down his opposition he did not overpower them early.

If one is considering all era's and all rules, e.g. 45 round fights to the finish, both 5 and 10 oz gloves, bare knuckles, rules that allowed a lot of holding etc., then Jeffries could be argued into the top 5. However, when assessing boxing as a modern sport the standard should be a 20 foot ring, 8-10 oz gloves, modern rules and a 15 round standard that dominated most of the last 100 plus years.

All time great Jack Dempsey has dropped a few sports and pioneer Jack Johnson has dropped out of my ratings.

Jack Dempsey has dropped a few notches. I do believe that Dempsey was a very vicious fighter and ruthless attacker but also realize that he excelled against certain types of opponents, on film he struggled against clever boxers. For more on this see Frank Lotierzo's expose' Jack Dempsey: An Observation Through The Lens

Jack Johnson has dropped off of my list.

  1. Some people have compared Jack Johnson to Muhammad Ali in terms of talent but Johnson did not have Ali’s concrete chin and durability.
  2. His vaunted defense was fine against someone who threw 1 or 2 punches at a time like his competition did but many of the things he did would not hold up against a more sophisticated attack. Any defensive boxer is most vulnerable to pressure. When studying the films again I noticed the swarmers he fought were simply horrendous. They attacked in a straight line, which is ineffective and makes them vulnerable to Johnson’s punches coming straight at him. They also followed him around the ring like a puppet and did not know how to cut off his escape routes. As Mike Tyson points out at the beginning of the 1988 BBC video "Tyson and the Heavyweights" the things Johnson did would be more difficult to do in a modern ring against a more sophisticated attack because he wasn’t elusive with his body but just picked the punches out of the air one or two at a time and this would be very difficult to do against "consistent punching". .One can see Sam McVey, Jim Flynn, Jim Johnson, Tommy Burns, Frank Moran, and Jess Willard heads straight up , rather than chin down, no head movement or upper body movement, and little footwork, if any. One can see wild, winging punches .We see linear direct line attack with NO side to side upper body movement or level changes. One does not see defensive responsibility when they attack but are simply wide open. It doesn’t matter how old the film is, one can still see these things if one knows what they are watching.
  3. The fact that he drew the "color line" against his own race to a great extent also factored into his rating. He fought Sam Langford when he was a middleweight who only weighed 156 pounds, all of his bouts against Sam McVey were when he was under the age of 19, he fought Joe Jeannette in Jeannette's 4th pro fight whereas he was a veteran of around 30 pro fights and in their last fight Jeannette still had only 21 fights as of their final meeting. Once all 3 reached the peak of their careers and were legitimate threats to the title Johnson refused to give any of them a title shot. Whereas Joe Louis barred no one and Rocky Marciano fought everyone who was their Johnson was the biggest ducker in history.

In his book50 Years at Ringside Fleischer rated the all time heavyweights in a number of categories. Here is Cox’s Corner’s up to date list.


Light-heavyweight Ratings:

  1. Sam Langford
  2. Gene Tunney
  3. Ezzard Charles
  4. Tommy Loughran
  5. Mike Spinks
  6. Archie Moore
  7. Bob Foster
  8. Roy Jones Jr.
  9. Billy Conn
  10. Philadelphia Jack O’Brien


Middleweights Ratings:

  1. Harry Greb
  2. Bob Fitzsimmons
  3. Carlos Monzon
  4. Marvin Hagler
  5. Stanley Ketchel
  6. Bernard Hopkins
  7. Charley Burley
  8. Marcel Cerdan
  9. Dick Tiger
  10. Jake Lamotta


Welterweight Ratings:

  1. Ray Robinson
  2. Ray Leonard
  3. Mickey Walker
  4. Thomas Hearns
  5. Joe Walcott
  6. Jose Napoles
  7. Kid Gavilan
  8. Emile Griffith
  9. Ted “Kid” Lewis
  10. Luis Rodriguez

Note: Floyd Mayweather’s career does not give him a top 10 spot. Luis Rodriguez, for example, had a better career than Floyd beating Emile Griffith, Benny Paret, Hurricane Carter, Curtis Cokes, Georgie Benton and Bennie Briscoe. I cannot in all honesty put Mayweather in the top 10 welterweights based on a career of hand picked opponents and having never unified a major title. Floyd avoided fights with Mosley, Margarito and Pacquiao when they meant something. He waited for these opponents to slow down and fade before considering facing them. Mayweather just does not have the competition to be considered a true all time great. I am not convinced that Floyd would beat any of the top 10 all time welterweights.


Lightweight Ratings:

  1. Joe Gans
  2. Benny Leonard
  3. Roberto Duran
  4. Pernell Whitaker
  5. Aaron Pryor
  6. Barney Ross
  7. Tony Canzoneri
  8. Julio Cesar Chavez
  9. Jack Blackburn
  10. Ike Williams


Featherweight Ratings:

  1. Henry Armstrong
  2. Willie Pep
  3. Alexis Arguello
  4. Sandy Saddler
  5. Kid Chocolate
  6. Salvador Sanchez
  7. Abe Attell
  8. Jim Driscoll
  9. Johnny Dundee
  10. Manny Pacquiao


Bantamweight Ratings:

  1. Eder Jofre
  2. Terry McGovern
  3. George Dixon
  4. Carlos Zarate
  5. Rueben Olivares
  6. Panama “Al” Brown
  7. Pete Herman
  8. Manuel Ortiz
  9. Kid Williams
  10. Jeff Chandler


Flyweight Ratings:

  1. Jimmy Wilde
  2. Pascual Perez
  3. Pancho Villa
  4. Jimmy Barry
  5. Fidel LaBarba
  6. Frankie Genaro
  7. Benny Lynch
  8. Fighting Harada
  9. Miguel Canto
  10. Ricardo Lopez



All Time Pound 4 Pound

  1. Ray Robinson
  2. Joe Gans
  3. Sam Langford
  4. Harry Greb
  5. Joe Louis
  6. Henry Armstrong
  7. Muhammad Ali
  8. Benny Leonard
  9. Roberto Duran
  10. Ray Leonard


  Sugar Ray Robinson in his prime


The final spot was a close race between Ray Leonard, Willie Pep, Bob Fitzsimmons, Jack Dempsey, Jimmy Wilde and Eder Jofre. Ray Leonard could beat you in more ways than could Pep who was a pure boxer or Fitz, Dempsey and Wilde who relied more on their punch. Eder Jofre was as talented but Leonard simply beat better competition.